[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63e7adbf-0eb8-4d59-ae7a-689b9d9f69b4@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:20:56 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11-rc1
On 7/30/24 11:04 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 08:29:20AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 02:40:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> The merge window felt pretty normal, and the stats all look pretty
>>> normal too. I was expecting things to be quieter because of summer
>>> vacations, but that (still) doesn't actually seem to have been the
>>> case.
>>>
>>> There's 12k+ regular commits (and another 850 merge commits), so as
>>> always the summary of this all is just my merge log. The diffstats are
>>> also (once again) dominated by some big hardware descriptions (another
>>> AMD GPU register dump accounts for ~45% of the lines in the diff, and
>>> some more perf event JSON descriptor files account for another 5%).
>>>
>>> But if you ignore those HW dumps, the diff too looks perfectly
>>> regular: drivers account for a bit over half (even when not counting
>>> the AMD register description noise). The rest is roughly one third
>>> architecture updates (lots of it is dts files, so I guess I could have
>>> lumped that in with "more hw descriptor tables"), one third tooling
>>> and documentation, and one third "core kernel" (filesystems,
>>> networking, VM and kernel). Very roughly.
>>>
>>> If you want more details, you should get the git tree, and then narrow
>>> things down based on interests.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> total: 158 pass: 139 fail: 19
>> Failed builds:
> ...
>> i386:q35:pentium3:defconfig:pae:nosmp:net=ne2k_pci:initrd
>
> This failure bisects to commit 0256994887d7 ("Merge tag
> 'for-6.11/block-post-20240722' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux"). I have no
> idea why that would be the case, but it is easy to reproduce. Maybe it is
> coincidental. Either case, copying Jens in case he has an idea.
I can take a look, but please post some details on what is actually
being run here so I can attempt to reproduce it. I looked at your
initial email too, and there's a link in there to:
https://kerneltests.org/builders
but I'm still not sure what's being run.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists