[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cecfbed5-aec1-439b-a866-4eebcd3bd421@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:58:11 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Marijn
Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Vara Reddy <quic_varar@...cinc.com>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
<quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dp: fix the max supported bpp logic
On 7/29/2024 1:08 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Abhinav Kumar (2024-07-29 11:28:35)
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> Your change looks valid. We can use this and drop the max_t usage.
>>
>> Let me push this with your Suggested-by credits.
>
> You can take my
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>
> and either squash it in or make a follow-up.
Done, I have squashed it into this.
I have also re-tested and since the logic is the same, I have retained
Dmitry's Tested-by
Powered by blists - more mailing lists