[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ff796ca4b4f5610bc2d4a479b8cafbb595c7b3a1.1722362534.git.calvin@wbinvd.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:05:30 -0700
From: Calvin Owens <calvin@...nvd.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvin@...nvd.org>,
David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: Fix two buggy list traversals
Both of these list traversals use list_for_each_entry_safe(), yet drop
the lock protecting the list during the traversal.
Because the _safe() iterator stores a pointer to the next list node
locally so the current node can be deleted, dropping the lock this way
means the next "cached" list_head might be freed by another caller,
leading the iterator to dereference pointers in freed memory after
reacquiring the lock.
Fix by moving to-be-deleted objects to an on-stack list before actually
deleting them, so the lock can be held for the entire traversal.
This is a bit ugly, because mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry() will still
take the rx_reorder_tbl_lock to delete the item from the two on-stack
lists introduced in this patch. But that is just ugly, not wrong, and
the function has other callers... making the locking conditional seems
strictly uglier.
I discovered this bug while studying the new "nxpwifi" driver, which was
sent to the mailing list about a month ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240621075208.513497-1-yu-hao.lin@nxp.com/
...but it turns out the new 11n_rxreorder.c in nxpwifi is essentially
exactly identical to mwifiex, save for s/mwifiex/nxpwifi/, so I wanted
to pass along a bugfix for the original driver as well.
I only have an IW612, so this patch was only tested on "nxpwifi".
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@...nvd.org>
---
.../wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c | 26 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
index 10690e82358b..fbaecfd32429 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c
@@ -249,20 +249,20 @@ mwifiex_11n_get_rx_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private *priv, int tid, u8 *ta)
void mwifiex_11n_del_rx_reorder_tbl_by_ta(struct mwifiex_private *priv, u8 *ta)
{
struct mwifiex_rx_reorder_tbl *tbl, *tmp;
+ LIST_HEAD(tmplist);
if (!ta)
return;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) {
- if (!memcmp(tbl->ta, ta, ETH_ALEN)) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, tbl);
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- }
- }
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list)
+ if (!memcmp(tbl->ta, ta, ETH_ALEN))
+ list_move_tail(&tbl->list, &tmplist);
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(tbl, tmp, &tmplist, list)
+ mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, tbl);
+
return;
}
@@ -785,17 +785,15 @@ void mwifiex_11n_ba_stream_timeout(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
void mwifiex_11n_cleanup_reorder_tbl(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
{
struct mwifiex_rx_reorder_tbl *del_tbl_ptr, *tmp_node;
+ LIST_HEAD(tmplist);
spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(del_tbl_ptr, tmp_node,
- &priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, list) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, del_tbl_ptr);
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
- }
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr);
+ list_splice_tail_init(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_ptr, &tmplist);
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->rx_reorder_tbl_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(del_tbl_ptr, tmp_node, &tmplist, list)
+ mwifiex_del_rx_reorder_entry(priv, del_tbl_ptr);
+
mwifiex_reset_11n_rx_seq_num(priv);
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists