[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccd40ae1-14aa-454e-9620-b34154f03e53@rbox.co>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:55:21 +0200
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix error path in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() on
xa_store() failure
On 7/30/24 17:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> If the xa_store() fails in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() then we shouldn't
> drop the reference to the 'struct kvm' because the vCPU fd has been
> installed and will take care of the refcounting.
>
> This was found by inspection, but forcing the xa_store() to fail
> confirms the problem:
>
> | Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff800080ecd960
> | Call trace:
> | _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x2c/0x70
> | kvm_irqfd_release+0x24/0xa0
> | kvm_vm_release+0x1c/0x38
> | __fput+0x88/0x2ec
> | ____fput+0x10/0x1c
> | task_work_run+0xb0/0xd4
> | do_exit+0x210/0x854
> | do_group_exit+0x70/0x98
> | get_signal+0x6b0/0x73c
> | do_signal+0xa4/0x11e8
> | do_notify_resume+0x60/0x12c
> | el0_svc+0x64/0x68
> | el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc
> | el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
> | Code: b9000909 d503201f 2a1f03e1 52800028 (88e17c08)
>
> Add a new label to the error path so that we can branch directly to the
> xa_release() if the xa_store() fails.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index d0788d0a72cc..b80dd8cead8c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4293,7 +4293,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long id)
>
> if (KVM_BUG_ON(xa_store(&kvm->vcpu_array, vcpu->vcpu_idx, vcpu, 0), kvm)) {
> r = -EINVAL;
> - goto kvm_put_xa_release;
> + goto err_xa_release;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4310,6 +4310,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long id)
>
> kvm_put_xa_release:
> kvm_put_kvm_no_destroy(kvm);
> +err_xa_release:
> xa_release(&kvm->vcpu_array, vcpu->vcpu_idx);
> unlock_vcpu_destroy:
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
My bad for neglecting the "impossible" path. Thanks for the fix.
I wonder if it's complete. If we really want to consider the possibility of
this xa_store() failing, then keeping vCPU fd installed and calling
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu) on the error path looks wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists