lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172236651785.95648.14253636888913221016.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:08:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev: Add missing spi_device_id for bh2228fv

On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:35:47 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When the of_device_id entry for "rohm,bh2228fv" was added, the
> corresponding spi_device_id was forgotten, causing a warning message
> during boot-up:
> 
>     SPI driver spidev has no spi_device_id for rohm,bh2228fv
> 
> Fix module autoloading and shut up the warning by adding the missing
> entry.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spidev: Add missing spi_device_id for bh2228fv
      commit: e4c4638b6a10427d30e29d22351c375886025f47

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ