linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18b83c34-c0e4-466c-aaa1-fff38c507e9a@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:14:22 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@...sung.com>
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
	linux-fsd@...la.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	peppe.cavallaro@...com, joabreu@...opsys.com, rcsekar@...sung.com,
	ssiddha@...la.com, jayati.sahu@...sung.com,
	pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, ravi.patel@...sung.com,
	gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support

> +static int dwc_eqos_rxmux_setup(void *priv, bool external)
> +{
> +	int i = 0;
> +	struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *plat = priv;
> +	struct clk *rx1 = NULL;
> +	struct clk *rx2 = NULL;
> +	struct clk *rx3 = NULL;

Reverse Christmas tree please.

> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data {
>  	void (*ptp_clk_freq_config)(struct stmmac_priv *priv);
>  	int (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv);
>  	void (*exit)(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv);
> +	int (*rxmux_setup)(void *priv, bool external);
>  	struct mac_device_info *(*setup)(void *priv);
>  	int (*clks_config)(void *priv, bool enabled);
>  	int (*crosststamp)(ktime_t *device, struct system_counterval_t *system,

It would be good if one of the stmmas Maintainers looked at
this. There are already a lot of function pointers here, we should not
be added another one if one of the exiting ones could be used.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr