[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqlvkdIoZAkVrvvx@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:56:17 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Cc: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
christian.koenig@....com, ltuikov89@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Add interface for user-defined
workqueue lockdep map
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:53:38PM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> I didn't want to change the export alloc_workqueue() arguments so I went
> with this approach. Are you suggesting export a new function
> alloc_workqueue_lockdep_map() which will share an internal
> implementation with the existing alloc_workqueue() but passes in a
> lockdep map? That could work.
Yeah, add a new exported function which takes lockdep_map and make
alloc_workqueue() to call that with the embedded map. No need to make the
latter inline either.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists