linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86c0c9ee-f1f3-414a-bde3-c171bbce85c1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:03:30 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

On 7/30/24 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.3 release.
> There are 809 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:14:54 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.3-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

perf failed to build with the following error:

In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_len':
tests/pmu.c:400:25: error: too few arguments to function 
'pmu_name_len_no_suffix'
   TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpu", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpu") == strlen("cpu"));
                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tests/tests.h:15:8: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL'
   if (!(cond)) {        \
         ^~~~
In file included from util/evsel.h:13,
                  from util/evlist.h:14,
                  from tests/pmu.c:2:
util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here
  int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num);
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:

this is caused by 958e16410f96ee72efc7a93e5d1774e8a236f2f5 ("perf tests: 
Add some pmu core functionality tests")
-- 
Florian