[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <017486e3-2132-44a0-ade8-94647de78cef@web.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 01:37:34 +0200
From: Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@....de>
To: skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
conor@...nel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
pavel@...x.de, rwarsow@....de, shuah@...nel.org, srw@...dewatkins.net,
stable@...r.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/440] 6.1.103-rc1 review
Hi,
could be the same issue as for me, see [1] for details.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/de6f52bb-c670-4e03-9ce1-b4ee9b981686@web.de/
Does applying 6259151c04d4e0085e00d2dcb471ebdd1778e72e from mainline
(adapt hunk #2 to cleanly apply) help in your case, too, or do you maybe
detected a different issue?
Cheers,
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists