lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <193e302c-4401-4756-a552-9f1e07ecedcf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:11:39 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
 fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] c0bff412e6: stress-ng.clone.ops_per_sec -2.9%
 regression

On 30.07.24 07:00, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed a -2.9% regression of stress-ng.clone.ops_per_sec on:

Is that test even using hugetlb? Anyhow, this pretty much sounds like 
noise and can be ignored.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ