[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <193e302c-4401-4756-a552-9f1e07ecedcf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:11:39 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] c0bff412e6: stress-ng.clone.ops_per_sec -2.9%
regression
On 30.07.24 07:00, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed a -2.9% regression of stress-ng.clone.ops_per_sec on:
Is that test even using hugetlb? Anyhow, this pretty much sounds like
noise and can be ignored.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists