[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ac00a45-ac61-41b4-9f74-d18157b8b6bf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:59:59 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: phy: aquantia: wait for FW
reset before checking the vendor ID
Hi Bartosz,
On 08/07/2024 08:50, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Checking the firmware register before it complete the boot process makes
> no sense, it will report 0 even if FW is available from internal memory.
> Always wait for FW to boot before continuing or we'll unnecessarily try
> to load it from nvmem/filesystem and fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
> index 0c9640ef153b..524627a36c6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,10 @@ int aqr_firmware_load(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + ret = aqr_wait_reset_complete(phydev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> /* Check if the firmware is not already loaded by pooling
> * the current version returned by the PHY. If 0 is returned,
> * no firmware is loaded.
Although this fixed another issue we were seeing with this driver, we
have been reviewing this change and have a question about it.
According to the description for the function aqr_wait_reset_complete()
this function is intended to give the device time to load firmware and
check there is a valid firmware ID.
If a valid firmware ID (non-zero) is detected, then
aqr_wait_reset_complete() will return 0 (because
phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() returns 0 on success and -ETIMEDOUT upon a
timeout).
If it times out, then it would appear that with the above code we don't
attempt to load the firmware by any other means?
Hence, I was wondering if we want this ...
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
index 524627a36c6f..a167f42ae36b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_firmware.c
@@ -353,16 +353,12 @@ int aqr_firmware_load(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
int ret;
- ret = aqr_wait_reset_complete(phydev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- /* Check if the firmware is not already loaded by pooling
+ /* Check if the firmware is not already loaded by polling
* the current version returned by the PHY. If 0 is returned,
- * no firmware is loaded.
+ * firmware is loaded.
*/
- ret = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_GLOBAL_FW_ID);
- if (ret > 0)
+ ret = aqr_wait_reset_complete(phydev);
+ if (!ret)
goto exit;
ret = aqr_firmware_load_nvmem(phydev);
Our Aquantia PHY has a SPI-NOR and so we don't to test the other
firmware loading cases.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists