[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240730105910.443753-1-a-singh21@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:29:10 +0530
From: Amneesh Singh <a-singh21@...com>
To: <sstabellini@...nel.org>
CC: <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <jasowang@...hat.com>,
<jgross@...e.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-imx@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mst@...hat.com>, <peng.fan@....com>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma
Hi Stefano,
First off, apologies for bumping this dead thread.
I came across this patch signed off by you recently
https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commit/72cb5514953be3aa2ac00c57c9eaa100ecc67176
and was wondering if a patch replacing xen_domain() with xen_pv_domain() in
vring_use_dma_api() can be sent upstream? If not, is there a reason why?
Regards
Amneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists