[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37b07e69-df85-45fc-888d-54cb7c4be97a@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:04:04 +0800
From: Huan Yang <link@...o.com>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce DMA_HEAP_ALLOC_AND_READ_FILE heap flag
在 2024/7/30 17:05, Huan Yang 写道:
>
> 在 2024/7/30 16:56, Daniel Vetter 写道:
>> [????????? daniel.vetter@...ll.ch ?????????
>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification?????????????]
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:57:44PM +0800, Huan Yang wrote:
>>> UDMA-BUF step:
>>> 1. memfd_create
>>> 2. open file(buffer/direct)
>>> 3. udmabuf create
>>> 4. mmap memfd
>>> 5. read file into memfd vaddr
>> Yeah this is really slow and the worst way to do it. You absolutely want
>> to start _all_ the io before you start creating the dma-buf, ideally
>> with
>> everything running in parallel. But just starting the direct I/O with
>> async and then creating the umdabuf should be a lot faster and avoid
> That's greate, Let me rephrase that, and please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> UDMA-BUF step:
> 1. memfd_create
> 2. mmap memfd
> 3. open file(buffer/direct)
> 4. start thread to async read
> 3. udmabuf create
>
> With this, can improve
I just test with it. Step is:
UDMA-BUF step:
1. memfd_create
2. mmap memfd
3. open file(buffer/direct)
4. start thread to async read
5. udmabuf create
6 . join wait
3G file read all step cost 1,527,103,431ns, it's greate.
>
>> needlessly serialization operations.
>>
>> The other issue is that the mmap has some overhead, but might not be too
>> bad.
> Yes, the time spent on page fault in mmap should be negligible
> compared to the time spent on file read.
>> -Sima
>> --
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists