[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMdWS+b0nqK4vuU5+VhZES5EabQzj5P7vtejSy5HNnQt8xeww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:41:47 -0700
From: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
jes@...ined-monkey.org, kda@...ux-powerpc.org, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev,
dougmill@...ux.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, nnac123@...ux.ibm.com,
tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com, cooldavid@...ldavid.org, nbd@....name,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, lorenzo@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
borisp@...dia.com, bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, louis.peens@...igine.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acenic@...site.dk,
linux-net-drivers@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 14/15] net: marvell: Convert tasklet API to new
bottom half workqueue mechanism
> > - * Called only from mvpp2_txq_done(), called from mvpp2_tx()
> > - * (migration disabled) and from the TX completion tasklet (migration
> > - * disabled) so using smp_processor_id() is OK.
> > + * Called only from mvpp2_txq_done().
> > + *
> > + * Historically, this function was invoked directly from mvpp2_tx()
> > + * (with migration disabled) and from the bottom half workqueue.
> > + * Verify that the use of smp_processor_id() is still appropriate
> > + * considering the current bottom half workqueue implementation.
>
> What does this mean? You want somebody else to verify this? You are
> potentially breaking this driver?
>
Thanks for providing the review. Apologies for not having worded
this correctly. Russel did ask me to leave it as it was when I first sent out
the series. Perhaps I should do so. Kindly advice.
Thanks,
Allen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists