[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b98fb5f-a5e8-4db8-ba5c-4cec9b5dfd63@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 04:39:24 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
<ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <alexanderduyck@...com>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>,
<Pier.Beruto@...emi.com>, <Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch>,
<linux@...ler.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/14] Add support for OPEN Alliance
10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface
Hi Andrew,
On 31/07/24 1:59 am, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 09:38:52AM +0530, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>> This patch series contain the below updates,
>> - Adds support for OPEN Alliance 10BASE-T1x MACPHY Serial Interface in the
>> net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c.
>> Link to the spec:
>> -----------------
>> https://opensig.org/download/document/OPEN_Alliance_10BASET1x_MAC-PHY_Serial_Interface_V1.1.pdf
>>
>> - Adds driver support for Microchip LAN8650/1 Rev.B1 10BASE-T1S MACPHY
>> Ethernet driver in the net/ethernet/microchip/lan865x/lan865x.c.
>> Link to the product:
>> --------------------
>> https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/lan8650
>
> FYI: This is on my RADAR, but low priority, probably not until i get
> back from vacation. Given the very long timer between revisions, i
> don't see this delay being a problem.
Thanks for the info. There was a confusion between patches, created this
much delay in posting the next version. Surely next time will take care
of the timeline. Sorry for the inconvenience. Eagerly waiting for your
review feedback. We really appreciate your support on this.
Best regards,
Parthiban V
>
> Andrew
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists