[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240731212325.GY40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 23:23:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add selftests/x86 entry
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > Kind reminder
> >
> > On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > > Kind reminder
>
> Top post ???
>
> > >
> > > On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> > > > There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86.
> > > > Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or
> > > > in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86
> > > > maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as
> > > > correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix
> > > > this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfoundation.org
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
>
> Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists