[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqmG_c2tjKNAJWfh@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:36:13 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Cc: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
christian.koenig@....com, ltuikov89@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] workqueue: Add interface for user-defined
workqueue lockdep map
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:31:17PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> +#define alloc_ordered_workqueue_lockdep_map(fmt, flags, lockdep_map, args...) \
> + alloc_workqueue_lockdep_map(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED | (flags), 1, lockdep_map, ##args)
> +#endif
alloc_ordered_workqueue() is a macro too but would you mind making this an
inline function?
> @@ -4795,11 +4795,17 @@ static void wq_init_lockdep(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
>
> static void wq_unregister_lockdep(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> {
> + if (wq->flags & __WQ_USER_OWNED_LOCKDEP)
> + return;
Do you still need the flag? Can't you test wq->lockdep_map !=
&wq->__lockdep_map instead?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists