linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024073112-stir-glue-d1b5@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:49:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 7/30/24 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.3 release.
> > There are 809 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:14:54 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.3-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> perf failed to build with the following error:
> 
> In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
> tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_len':
> tests/pmu.c:400:25: error: too few arguments to function
> 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix'
>   TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpu", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpu") == strlen("cpu"));
>                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tests/tests.h:15:8: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL'
>   if (!(cond)) {        \
>         ^~~~
> In file included from util/evsel.h:13,
>                  from util/evlist.h:14,
>                  from tests/pmu.c:2:
> util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here
>  int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from tests/pmu.c:7:
> 
> this is caused by 958e16410f96ee72efc7a93e5d1774e8a236f2f5 ("perf tests: Add
> some pmu core functionality tests")

Thanks, now dropped.  I'll do a -rc2 in a bit so that tests can verify
this works properly.

greg k-h