[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240731-burrowing-lionfish-of-grandeur-e45e30-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:02:00 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>, David Jander <david.jander@...tonic.nl>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next 11/21] can: rockchip_canfd: add functions to
check if CAN-FD frames are equal
On 30.07.2024 17:37:30, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Add a pair new functions to check if 2 struct canfd_frame are equal.
> > The 1st checks if the header of the CAN frames are equal, the 2nd
> > checks if the data portion are equal:
> >
> > - rkcanfd_can_frame_header_equal()
> > - rkcanfd_can_frame_data_equal()
> >
> > This functionality is needed in the next patch.
>
> nit: I would squash this into the next patch as
> rkcanfd_can_frame_header_equal() is defined but
> unused in this patch, which is flagged by
> allmodconfig W=1 builds.
Makes sense, done.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists