[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17c0f7e8-5e16-41e1-9b11-a6fa00169856@iwave-global.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:23:00 +0530
From: Nikhil Kashyap H R <nikhil.kashyap@...ve-global.com>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Investigation Request - Strange PEB Reservation Behavior in UBI
Dear Team,
I am writing to request an investigation into a strange issue we have
observed regarding PEB reservation for bad block management in UBI. For
context, our system uses MT29FxxG NAND flash chips with a minimum of
4016 valid blocks (NVB) per LUN out of a total of 4096 blocks.
We have noticed that when using the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT parameter,
which is typically calculated as 1024 * (1 - MinNVB / TotalNVB) = 20
PEBs, UBI is reserving significantly more PEBs than expected. Instead of
the expected 20 PEBs, UBI is reserving around 160 PEBs per LUN, which is
approximately 8 times more than it should be.
To work around this issue, we have set the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT
parameter to 3, which corresponds to ~91 reserved PEBs per LUN. However,
this strange 8x multiplier effect is concerning and requires further
investigation. Additionally, we have observed crashes in our system and
suspect that the over-reservation of PEBs for bad block handling may be
related to these issues.
We would like to understand the root cause of the crashes and how the
excessive PEB reservation might be contributing to the problem. We have
some similar questions related to the PEB's usage in UBI operations:
Why is UBI reserving significantly more PEBs for bad block handling than
expected when using the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT parameter?
1A) The typical calculation suggests reserving 20 PEBs, but UBI is
reserving 8 times more, around 160 PEBs per LUN. What is causing this 8x
multiplier effect?
Does the issue of over-reserving PEBs only occur when multiple NAND
partitions are grouped under the same parent MTD device, as is the case
with the custom driver? Or can it also happen with a single NAND
partition per MTD device?
Is the over-reservation of PEBs for bad block handling related to the
crashes observed in the system? If so, what is the root cause of the
crashes and how does the excessive PEB reservation contribute to the issue?
What is the expected behavior of UBI when reserving PEBs for bad block
management based on the CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT parameter? Why is UBI
not following the typical calculation in this case?
Are there any known bugs, issues or unexpected behaviors in the UBI
subsystem or NAND flash drivers that could explain the observed PEB
reservation problem? If so, are there any workarounds or fixes available?
We would greatly appreciate if you could investigate this issue and
provide us with your findings and recommendations.
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Nikhil Kashyap H R
Powered by blists - more mailing lists