[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZqoOoUPDIeJX5M0e@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:14:57 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, afd@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, eric.devolder@...cle.com, robh@...nel.org,
vincent.whitchurch@...s.com, bhe@...hat.com, nico@...xnic.net,
ardb@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 06:03:11PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On 2024/7/31 16:24, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 10:07:53AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> >>> + bl need_irq_preemption
> >>> + cmp r0, #0
> >>> + beq 2f
> >>> +#endif
> >
> > Depending on the interrupt rate, this can be regarded as a fast path,
> > it would be nice if we could find a way to use static branches in
> > assembly code.
> It seems to be hard to use static keys in assembly code.
>
> By the way, currently, most architectures have simplified assembly code
> and implemented its most functions in C functions. Does arm32 have this
> plan?
arm32 is effectively in maintenance mode; very little active development
is occuring. So, there are no plans to change the code without good
reason (as code changes without reason will needlessly affect its
stability.)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists