[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zqoh5w9b8nGBw9UY@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:37:11 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom: qmp-pcie: Configure all tables on port B PHY
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 04:52:05PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 26-07-24, 16:42, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > One more nit: subject prefix should be just
> >
> > phy: qcom-qmp-pcie:
>
> I dont this so, phy: qcom: subdriver is better and used more widely than
> this
I don't really care, but if you check the logs you'll see that 90% of
the commits do not use a "phy: qcom:" prefix:
$ git log --oneline --no-merges drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp* | grep "phy: qcom: " | wc
43 404 2949
$ git log --oneline --no-merges drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp* | grep "phy: qcom-qmp-" | wc
310 2346 20020
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists