[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024073128-tinfoil-unaligned-8164@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:53:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Simplify driver API
device_find_child_by_name() implementation
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 09:21:50AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>
> Simplify device_find_child_by_name() implementation by using present
> driver APIs device_find_child() and device_match_name().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 15 +++------------
> include/linux/device.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 730cae66607c..22ab4b8a2bcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -4089,18 +4089,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_find_child);
> struct device *device_find_child_by_name(struct device *parent,
> const char *name)
> {
> - struct klist_iter i;
> - struct device *child;
> -
> - if (!parent)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - klist_iter_init(&parent->p->klist_children, &i);
> - while ((child = next_device(&i)))
> - if (sysfs_streq(dev_name(child), name) && get_device(child))
> - break;
> - klist_iter_exit(&i);
> - return child;
> + /* TODO: remove type cast after const device_find_child() prototype */
I do not understand the TODO here. Why is it needed? Why not fix it up
now?
> + return device_find_child(parent, (void *)name,
> + (int (*)(struct device *, void *))device_match_name);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_find_child_by_name);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 34eb20f5966f..685ffd2dc867 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct dev_pin_info;
> struct dev_iommu;
> struct msi_device_data;
>
> +/* TODO: unify device match() parameter of driver APIs to this signature */
Same here, why have this? Why not unify them and then fix this up?
> +typedef int (*device_match_t)(struct device *dev, const void *data);
> +
> /**
> * struct subsys_interface - interfaces to device functions
> * @name: name of the device function
> @@ -1073,6 +1076,7 @@ int device_for_each_child(struct device *dev, void *data,
> int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data));
> int device_for_each_child_reverse(struct device *dev, void *data,
> int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data));
> +/* TODO: change type of @data to const void * and @match to device_match_t */
Again, why leave this here?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists