linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: shmem: avoid allocating huge pages larger than MAX_PAGECACHE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bf97923f-b59a-4d91-95b5-67e555fb4cd3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:06:59 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
 hughd@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, david@...hat.com,
 ryan.roberts@....com, ziy@...dia.com, gshan@...hat.com, ioworker0@...il.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: shmem: avoid allocating huge pages larger than
 MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER for shmem



On 2024/8/1 04:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:22:17 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
>> (Hope Andrew can help to squash these changes :))
> 
> I'm seeing some rejects against, amongst other things, your own "Some
> cleanups for shmem" series.
> 
> So... v2, please?

These two bugfix patches are based on the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch 
and need to be merged into 6.11-rcX, so they should be queued first.

For the 'Some cleanups for shmem' series, I can send a new V4 version to 
you after resolving conflicts with the shmem bugfix patches. Sorry for 
the inconvenience.