[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2aa9801-dbee-4ddb-99e7-4d058ce92aa1@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:49:54 +0800
From: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk@...nel.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<todor.too@...il.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>,
Yongsheng Li
<quic_yon@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] media: qcom: camss: Add CSID Gen3 support for
SM8550
Hi Bryan,
On 8/1/2024 7:14 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/08/2024 11:59, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> for preference every single patch applies and builds warning free.
>
> Oops mistyped
>
> - Every patch must apply cleanly
> - You could make an argument for some specific cases that
> a patch can generate a warning provided
> - By the end of your set everything must be warning free
>
> In this case though, I don't believe you need to make that case since,
> the problem you describe about probe() isn't a problem at all as you
> have no upstream dts that can drive the probe() at this point.
>
> Just do the dts at the end and no problem.
>
Thanks for the confirmation, maybe also can add a checking for the res,
probe returns fail if the .data->xxx_res is NULL.
Thanks,
Depeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists