| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZqukTsjWqbx-xZ7L@x1>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:05:50 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] perf test: Update sample filtering test
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 05:12:47PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 11:10:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:30:35PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Now it can run the BPF filtering test with normal user if the BPF
> > > objects are pinned by 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin'. Let's
> > > update the test case to verify the behavior. It'll skip the test if the
> > > filter check is failed from a normal user, but it shows a message how to
> > > set up the filters.
> > >
> > > First, run the test as a normal user and it fails.
> > >
> > > $ perf test -vv filtering
> > > 95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests:
> > > --- start ---
> > > test child forked, pid 425677
> > > Checking BPF-filter privilege
> > > try 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin' first. <<<--- here
> > > bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]
> > > ---- end(-2) ----
> > > 95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests : Skip
> > >
> > > According to the message, run the perf record command to pin the BPF
> > > objects.
> > >
> > > $ sudo perf record --setup-filter pin
> > >
> > > And re-run the test as a normal user.
> > >
> > > $ perf test -vv filtering
> > > 95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests:
> > > --- start ---
> > > test child forked, pid 424486
> > > Checking BPF-filter privilege
> > > Basic bpf-filter test
> > > Basic bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > Failing bpf-filter test
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> > > Failing bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > Group bpf-filter test
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE
> > > Group bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > ---- end(0) ----
> > > 95: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests : Ok
> >
> > Ok, so I tested one of the examples you provide as a root user:
> >
> > root@...ber:~# perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB - ]
> > perf-exec 228020 53029.825757: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7fe361d1cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf-exec 228020 53029.825760: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7fe361d1cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf 228020 53029.826313: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7fd80d7ba040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228020 53029.826316: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7fd80d7ba040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228020 53029.838051: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228020 53029.838054: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228020 53029.838055: 9 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228020 53029.844137: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228020 53029.844139: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > root@...ber:~# perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 100000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.025 MB - ]
> > perf-exec 228084 53076.760776: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f7e7691cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf-exec 228084 53076.760779: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f7e7691cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf-exec 228084 53076.760779: 10 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f7e7691cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf-exec 228084 53076.760780: 497 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f7e7691cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf-exec 228084 53076.760781: 27924 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f7e7691cc11 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf 228084 53076.761318: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f317057d040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.761320: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f317057d040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.761321: 14 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f317057d040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.761322: 518 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f317057d040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.761322: 20638 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f317057d040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.768070: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f317056e898 _dl_relocate_object+0x1d8 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.768072: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f317056e898 _dl_relocate_object+0x1d8 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.768073: 17 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f317056e898 _dl_relocate_object+0x1d8 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.768073: 836 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f317056e898 _dl_relocate_object+0x1d8 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.768074: 44346 cpu_core/cycles/u: 7f317056e89b _dl_relocate_object+0x1db (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228084 53076.843976: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53076.843978: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53076.843979: 13 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53076.843979: 563 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53076.843980: 26519 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53077.482090: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53077.482092: 1 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53077.482093: 15 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53077.482093: 746 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b062 noploop+0x62 (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > perf 228084 53077.482094: 38315 cpu_core/cycles/u: 53b05c noploop+0x5c (/home/acme/bin/perf)
> > root@...ber:~#
> >
> > Filtering by period works as advertised, now I have done as root;
> >
> > root@...ber:~# perf record --setup-filter pin
> > root@...ber:~# ls -la /sys/fs/bpf/perf_filter/
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 .
> > drwxr-xr-t. 3 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 ..
> > -rw-rw-rw-. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 dropped
> > -rw-rw-rw-. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 filters
> > -rwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 perf_sample_filter
> > -rw-rw-rw-. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 pid_hash
> > -rw-------. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 sample_f_rodata
> > root@...ber:~# ls -la /sys/fs/bpf/perf_filter/perf_sample_filter
> > -rwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Jul 31 10:43 /sys/fs/bpf/perf_filter/perf_sample_filter
> > root@...ber:~#
> >
> > And as a normal user I try:
> >
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u perf test -w noploop | perf script -i- | head
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.204 MB - ]
> > perf 228218 53158.670585: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b6e040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.670590: 1 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b6e040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.670592: 7 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b6e040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.670593: 117 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b6e040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.670595: 2152 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b6e040 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.670604: 38977 cpu_atom/cycles/u: ffffffff99201280 [unknown] ([unknown])
> > perf 228218 53158.670650: 167064 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b67d7c intel_check_word.constprop.0+0x16c (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.671472: 232830 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b75d98 strcmp+0x78 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.672710: 191183 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b59311 _dl_map_object_from_fd+0xea1 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 228218 53158.673461: 158125 cpu_atom/cycles/u: 7f2fb1b77148 strcmp+0x1428 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > acme@...ber:~$
> >
> > Ok, no filtering, bot samples, lets try to use filtering as with root:
> >
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.019 MB - ]
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.019 MB - ]
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.019 MB - ]
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.019 MB - ]
> > acme@...ber:~$
>
> Hmm.. strange. The above command works well for me.
>
> >
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -v -e cycles:u --filter 'period < 10000000' perf test -w noploop
> > Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-B7-1
> > DEBUGINFOD_URLS=
> > nr_cblocks: 0
> > affinity: SYS
> > mmap flush: 1
> > comp level: 0
> > Problems creating module maps, continuing anyway...
> > pid hash: 228434 -> 13
> > pid hash: 228434 -> 14
>
> This part is a little strange as it's using two entries. Hmm, are you
> using a hybrid machine? Anyway I think it should work there too..
Yes, I'll try it again on a 5950x since it isn't hybrid.
> Also the number is too high.. I expect 1 or 2. Maybe it didn't release
> all the entries. Let me think about the case.
I'm inclined for now to keep this series merged and then take fixes on
top, please advise if this isn't ok with you.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> > mmap size 528384B
> > Control descriptor is not initialized
> > Couldn't start the BPF side band thread:
> > BPF programs starting from now on won't be annotatable
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > failed to write feature CPU_PMU_CAPS
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.009 MB perf.data ]
> > acme@...ber:~$
> >
> > I also tried with task-clock:
> >
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e task-clock -c 10000 perf test -w noploop | perf script -i- | head
> > perf 229784 54146.473644: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1c622 get_common_indices.constprop.0+0xa2 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473654: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1d323 update_active.constprop.0+0x383 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473664: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1cd32 intel_check_word.constprop.0+0x122 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473674: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1cd7c intel_check_word.constprop.0+0x16c (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473684: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f19de5 __tunable_get_val+0x75 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473704: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f190d0 rtld_mutex_dummy+0x0 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473754: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1a80e _dl_cache_libcmp+0xe (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473864: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f2adb9 strcmp+0x99 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.473954: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f1aa02 search_cache+0x112 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > perf 229784 54146.474024: 10000 task-clock:u: 7faf38f0de38 _dl_map_object_from_fd+0x9c8 (/usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
> > acme@...ber:~$
> > acme@...ber:~$ perf record -o- -e task-clock -c 10000 --filter 'ip < 0xffffffff00000000' perf test -w noploop | perf script -i-
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.127 MB - ]
> > acme@...ber:~$
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> > I'm keeping it in my local tree so that I run it through the container
> > build tests meanwhile we try to understand this, what am I missing?
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> > ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ uname -a
> > Linux toolbox 6.9.10-200.fc40.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 18 21:39:30 UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ perf -vv
> > perf version 6.11.rc1.g77a71e434cf4
> > dwarf: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> > dwarf_getlocations: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> > syscall_table: [ on ] # HAVE_SYSCALL_TABLE_SUPPORT
> > libbfd: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
> > debuginfod: [ on ] # HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT
> > libelf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> > libnuma: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
> > numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
> > libperl: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT
> > libpython: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT
> > libslang: [ on ] # HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
> > libcrypto: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT
> > libunwind: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT
> > libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> > libcapstone: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT
> > zlib: [ on ] # HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT
> > lzma: [ on ] # HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT
> > get_cpuid: [ on ] # HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> > bpf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> > aio: [ on ] # HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
> > zstd: [ on ] # HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT
> > libpfm4: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPFM
> > libtraceevent: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
> > bpf_skeletons: [ on ] # HAVE_BPF_SKEL
> > dwarf-unwind-support: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
> > libopencsd: [ on ] # HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT
> > ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -10
> > 2a24133dc55000b3 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) perf test: Update sample filtering test
> > d6fed13469889202 perf record: Add --setup-filter option
> > d8a2ec627150b7a4 perf record: Fix a potential error handling issue
> > b0313e52f43035b5 perf bpf-filter: Support separate lost counts for each filter
> > eb29dacbaf215fda perf bpf-filter: Support pin/unpin BPF object
> > 086e7d06af7ce4eb perf bpf-filter: Split per-task filter use case
> > d3453d1bb80cdbb2 perf bpf-filter: Pass 'target' to perf_bpf_filter__prepare()
> > 736cd1c7a7105e1d perf bpf-filter: Make filters map a single entry hashmap
> > 96ff640908b9808e perf jevents: Don't stop at the first matched pmu when searching a events table
> > 379fe1f78ed5ceaf perf jevents: Use name for special find value (PMU_EVENTS__NOT_FOUND)
> > ⬢[acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh | 13 +++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
> > > index 31c593966e8c..c5882d620db7 100755
> > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh
> > > @@ -22,15 +22,16 @@ trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
> > > test_bpf_filter_priv() {
> > > echo "Checking BPF-filter privilege"
> > >
> > > - if [ "$(id -u)" != 0 ]
> > > - then
> > > - echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]"
> > > - err=2
> > > - return
> > > - fi
> > > if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'period > 1' \
> > > -o /dev/null --quiet true 2>&1
> > > then
> > > + if [ "$(id -u)" != 0 ]
> > > + then
> > > + echo "try 'sudo perf record --setup-filter pin' first."
> > > + echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped permission]"
> > > + err=2
> > > + return
> > > + fi
> > > echo "bpf-filter test [Skipped missing BPF support]"
> > > err=2
> > > return
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists