linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fixes: f32fb32820b1 ("KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT mapping level")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZM8o=B5mGedFpqNL46RRNdmq8FcTVXzS78BrHjGHBzEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:59:35 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, michael.roth@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com, 
	alpergun@...gle.com, ardb@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com, bp@...en8.de, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, 
	jarkko@...nel.org, jmattson@...gle.com, vannapurve@...gle.com, 
	erdemaktas@...gle.com, jroedel@...e.de, kirill@...temov.name, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, liam.merwick@...cle.com, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, 
	nikunj.dadhania@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com, pbonzini@...hat.com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, pgonda@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, 
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, 
	srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	thomas.lendacky@....com, tobin@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, 
	vkuznets@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes: f32fb32820b1 ("KVM: x86: Add hook for determining
 max NPT mapping level")

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:58 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> > The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if
> > PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return
> > max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level.
> >
>
> Fixes: ?

I think it's in the subject :)

>
> > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> > Change-Id: I403898aacc379ed98ba5caa41c9f1c52f277adc2
>
> Bad gerrit, bad!
>