[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <811ea0eb-bc87-4ac3-8bca-27c787e43051@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:14:38 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: arm64: Correct feature test for S1PIE in
get-reg-list
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 05:45:49PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Can we please switch all this stuff to symbolic naming instead of
> magic numbers? Given how much effort is going into the "automated
> generation" thing, it is mind-boggling that the tests still rely on
> handcrafted numbers. We just end-up with two different sets of bugs.
> At the moment, the level of confidence I have in this stuff is
> sub-zero.
Yeah, I was wondering why this wasn't using the generated values
especially given that the generated headers are available to tools - I
wasn't sure if this was a deliberate decision to cross check the data
entry or something. I'd certainly be happy to convert, though that does
seem a bit invasive for a fix.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists