linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: introduce MADV_DEMOTE/MADV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5de3795a-a75b-48af-b62c-07639cd21d59@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:36:15 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 BiscuitOS Broiler <zhang.renze@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
 James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de,
 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
 rdunlap@...radead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
 richard.henderson@...aro.org, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
 linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, jiaoxupo@....com, zhou.haofan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: introduce MADV_DEMOTE/MADV_PROMOTE

On 01.08.24 21:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:56:10 +0800 BiscuitOS Broiler <zhang.renze@....com> wrote:
> 
>> From: BiscuitOS Broiler <zhang.renze@....com>
> 
> Please use a real name.
> 
>  From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
> 
> : then you just add a line saying::
> :
> : 	Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@...eloper.example.org>
> :
> : using a known identity (sorry, no anonymous contributions.)
> 
> 

I'm curious, reading d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330, 
pseudonyms are allowed now as long as we are dealing with a "known 
identity".

"Real name" was replaced by "known identity" in that commit.

I'm pretty much in favor of people just using their real name here as 
well. But apparently, "knwon identity" is sufficient. Not that I could 
tell when someone is a "known identity". Likely "BiscuitOS Broiler" 
would be a known identity and not "anonymous"?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb