[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca056227-30c3-47b9-a19a-fbab87778f20@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:35:59 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [gustavoars:testing/wfamnae-next20240729-cbc-2 11/18]
include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h:643:15: error: static assertion failed due to
requirement '__builtin_offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) ==
sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr)': struct member likely outside of
struct_group_tagged()
On 01/08/24 16:14, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:17:50PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/24 13:08, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 06:47:58AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/08/24 05:35, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git testing/wfamnae-next20240729-cbc-2
>>>>> head: df15c862c1b93b6e1f6c90b0d7971f7a6ad66751
>>>>> commit: e7cd9f429a852fb7e37a706c7d08fc36e7863e06 [11/18] RDMA/uverbs: Use static_assert() to check struct sizes
>>>>> config: hexagon-randconfig-001-20240801 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240801/202408011956.wscyBwq6-lkp@intel.com/config)
>>>>> compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 430b90f04533b099d788db2668176038be38c53b)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Clang 20.0.0?? (thinkingface)
>>>
>>> Indeed, Clang 19 branched and main is now 20 :)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8f701b5df0adb3a2960d78ca2ad9cf53f39ba2fe
>>
>> Yeah, but is that a stable release?
>
> No, but the Intel folks have tested tip of tree LLVM against the kernel
> for us for a few years now to try and catch issues such as this.
Oh, I see, fine. :)
>
>> BTW, I don't see GCC reporting the same problem below:
>
> Hexagon does not have a GCC backend anymore so it is not going to be
> possible to do an exact A/B comparison with this configuration but...
>
>>>>>>> include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h:643:15: error: static assertion failed due to requirement '__builtin_offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) == sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr)': struct member likely outside of struct_group_tagged()
>>>>> 643 | static_assert(offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) == sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr),
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> 644 | "struct member likely outside of struct_group_tagged()");
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> include/linux/stddef.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
>>>>> 16 | #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __builtin_offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER)
>>>>> | ^
>>>>> include/linux/build_bug.h:77:50: note: expanded from macro 'static_assert'
>>>>> 77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr)
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:56: note: expanded from macro '__static_assert'
>>>>> 78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
>>>>> | ^~~~
>>>>> include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h:643:58: note: expression evaluates to '56 == 52'
>
> This seems to give some indication that perhaps there may be some
> architecture specific here with padding maybe? I seem to recall ARM OABI
> having something similar. Adding the Hexagon folks/list to get some more
> clarification. Full warning and context:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/202408011956.wscyBwq6-lkp@intel.com/
>
> The problematic section preprocessed since sometimes the macros
> obfuscate things:
>
> struct uverbs_attr_bundle {
> union {
> struct {
> struct ib_udata driver_udata;
> struct ib_udata ucore;
> struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile;
> struct ib_ucontext *context;
> struct ib_uobject *uobject;
> unsigned long attr_present[(((UVERBS_API_ATTR_BKEY_LEN) +
> ((sizeof(long) * 8)) - 1) /
> ((sizeof(long) * 8)))];
> };
> struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr {
> struct ib_udata driver_udata;
> struct ib_udata ucore;
> struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile;
> struct ib_ucontext *context;
> struct ib_uobject *uobject;
> unsigned long attr_present[(((UVERBS_API_ATTR_BKEY_LEN) +
> ((sizeof(long) * 8)) - 1) /
> ((sizeof(long) * 8)))];
> } hdr;
> };
>
> struct uverbs_attr attrs[];
> };
> _Static_assert(__builtin_offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) ==
> sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr),
> "struct member likely outside of struct_group_tagged()");
>
> FWIW, I see this with all versions of Clang that the kernel supports
> with this configuration.
I don't have access to a Clang compiler right now; I wonder if you could
help me get the output of this command:
pahole -C uverbs_attr_bundle drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.o
Thanks in advance!
-Gustavo
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
>>>>> 643 | static_assert(offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) == sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr),
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> 644 | "struct member likely outside of struct_group_tagged()");
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> include/linux/build_bug.h:77:50: note: expanded from macro 'static_assert'
>>>>> 77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr)
>>>>> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:56: note: expanded from macro '__static_assert'
>>>>> 78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
>>>>> | ^~~~
>>>>> 7 warnings and 1 error generated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> vim +643 include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h
>>>>>
>>>>> 630
>>>>> 631 struct uverbs_attr_bundle {
>>>>> 632 /* New members MUST be added within the struct_group() macro below. */
>>>>> 633 struct_group_tagged(uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr, hdr,
>>>>> 634 struct ib_udata driver_udata;
>>>>> 635 struct ib_udata ucore;
>>>>> 636 struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile;
>>>>> 637 struct ib_ucontext *context;
>>>>> 638 struct ib_uobject *uobject;
>>>>> 639 DECLARE_BITMAP(attr_present, UVERBS_API_ATTR_BKEY_LEN);
>>>>> 640 );
>>>>> 641 struct uverbs_attr attrs[];
>>>>> 642 };
>>>>> > 643 static_assert(offsetof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle, attrs) == sizeof(struct uverbs_attr_bundle_hdr),
>>>>> 644 "struct member likely outside of struct_group_tagged()");
>>>>> 645
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists