linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 57/83] ALSA: vmaster: Return error for invalid input values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240801002107.3934037-57-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:18:12 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	tiwai@...e.com,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 57/83] ALSA: vmaster: Return error for invalid input values

From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>

[ Upstream commit 10457f5042b4890a667e2f15a2e783490dda44d2 ]

So far the vmaster code has been tolerant about the input values and
accepts any values by correcting internally.  But now our own selftest
starts complaining about this behavior, so let's be picky and change
the behavior to return -EINVAL for invalid input values instead.

Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1d44be36-9bb9-4d82-8953-5ae2a4f09405@molgen.mpg.de
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20240616073454.16512-2-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 sound/core/vmaster.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/core/vmaster.c b/sound/core/vmaster.c
index 378d2c7c3d4af..4bc084b686d83 100644
--- a/sound/core/vmaster.c
+++ b/sound/core/vmaster.c
@@ -204,6 +204,12 @@ static int follower_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	err = follower_init(follower);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
+	for (ch = 0; ch < follower->info.count; ch++) {
+		if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch] < follower->info.min_val ||
+		    ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch] > follower->info.max_val)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	for (ch = 0; ch < follower->info.count; ch++) {
 		if (follower->vals[ch] != ucontrol->value.integer.value[ch]) {
 			changed = 1;
@@ -372,6 +378,8 @@ static int master_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	new_val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
 	if (new_val == old_val)
 		return 0;
+	if (new_val < master->info.min_val || new_val > master->info.max_val)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	err = sync_followers(master, old_val, new_val);
 	if (err < 0)
-- 
2.43.0