[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQEYutCiAMitEv0JY4PRY4tdLdqEy76qvY1xB5q8Y13mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:15:04 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Do jump_label_init before early_security_init
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:34 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> LSM indirect calls being are now replaced by static calls, this requires
> a jumpt_table_init before early_security_init where LSM hooks and their
> static calls and keys are initialized.
>
> Fixes: 2732ad5ecd5b ("lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls")
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
> ---
> init/main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Does this look okay, static call folks?
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 206acdde51f5..5bd45af7a49e 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ void start_kernel(void)
> boot_cpu_init();
> page_address_init();
> pr_notice("%s", linux_banner);
> + /* LSM and command line parameters use static keys */
> + jump_label_init();
> early_security_init();
> setup_arch(&command_line);
> setup_boot_config();
> @@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ void start_kernel(void)
> boot_cpu_hotplug_init();
>
> pr_notice("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
> - /* parameters may set static keys */
> - jump_label_init();
> parse_early_param();
> after_dashes = parse_args("Booting kernel",
> static_command_line, __start___param,
> --
> 2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists