[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufb7z13u51VCTGZMimoCXpmfT5AOAbrUpAvJjTx5+AXwew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 00:09:16 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
riel@...riel.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
david@...hat.com, baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, rppt@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: split underutilized THPs
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 6:54 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The current upstream default policy for THP is always. However, Meta
> uses madvise in production as the current THP=always policy vastly
> overprovisions THPs in sparsely accessed memory areas, resulting in
> excessive memory pressure and premature OOM killing.
> Using madvise + relying on khugepaged has certain drawbacks over
> THP=always. Using madvise hints mean THPs aren't "transparent" and
> require userspace changes. Waiting for khugepaged to scan memory and
> collapse pages into THP can be slow and unpredictable in terms of performance
> (i.e. you dont know when the collapse will happen), while production
> environments require predictable performance. If there is enough memory
> available, its better for both performance and predictability to have
> a THP from fault time, i.e. THP=always rather than wait for khugepaged
> to collapse it, and deal with sparsely populated THPs when the system is
> running out of memory.
>
> This patch-series is an attempt to mitigate the issue of running out of
> memory when THP is always enabled. During runtime whenever a THP is being
> faulted in or collapsed by khugepaged, the THP is added to a list.
> Whenever memory reclaim happens, the kernel runs the deferred_split
> shrinker which goes through the list and checks if the THP was underutilized,
> i.e. how many of the base 4K pages of the entire THP were zero-filled.
> If this number goes above a certain threshold, the shrinker will attempt
> to split that THP. Then at remap time, the pages that were zero-filled are
> not remapped, hence saving memory. This method avoids the downside of
> wasting memory in areas where THP is sparsely filled when THP is always
> enabled, while still providing the upside THPs like reduced TLB misses without
> having to use madvise.
>
> Meta production workloads that were CPU bound (>99% CPU utilzation) were
> tested with THP shrinker. The results after 2 hours are as follows:
>
> | THP=madvise | THP=always | THP=always
> | | | + shrinker series
> | | | + max_ptes_none=409
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Performance improvement | - | +1.8% | +1.7%
> (over THP=madvise) | | |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Memory usage | 54.6G | 58.8G (+7.7%) | 55.9G (+2.4%)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> max_ptes_none=409 means that any THP that has more than 409 out of 512
> (80%) zero filled filled pages will be split.
>
> To test out the patches, the below commands without the shrinker will
> invoke OOM killer immediately and kill stress, but will not fail with
> the shrinker:
>
> echo 450 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/max_ptes_none
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
> echo 20M > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.max
> echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.swap.max
> # allocate twice memory.max for each stress worker and touch 40/512 of
> # each THP, i.e. vm-stride 50K.
> # With the shrinker, max_ptes_none of 470 and below won't invoke OOM
> # killer.
> # Without the shrinker, OOM killer is invoked immediately irrespective
> # of max_ptes_none value and kill stress.
> stress --vm 1 --vm-bytes 40M --vm-stride 50K
>
> Patches 1-2 add back helper functions that were previously removed
> to operate on page lists (needed by patch 3).
> Patch 3 is an optimization to free zapped tail pages rather than
> waiting for page reclaim or migration.
> Patch 4 is a prerequisite for THP shrinker to not remap zero-filled
> subpages when splitting THP.
> Patches 6 adds support for THP shrinker.
>
> (This patch-series restarts the work on having a THP shrinker in kernel
> originally done in
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667454613.git.alexlzhu@fb.com/.
> The THP shrinker in this series is significantly different than the
> original one, hence its labelled v1 (although the prerequisite to not
> remap clean subpages is the same).)
>
> Alexander Zhu (1):
> mm: add selftests to split_huge_page() to verify unmap/zap of zero
> pages
>
> Usama Arif (3):
> Revert "memcg: remove mem_cgroup_uncharge_list()"
> Revert "mm: remove free_unref_page_list()"
> mm: split underutilized THPs
>
> Yu Zhao (2):
> mm: free zapped tail pages when splitting isolated thp
> mm: don't remap unused subpages when splitting isolated thp
I would recommend shatter [1] instead of splitting so that
1) whoever underutilized their THPs get punished for the overhead;
2) underutilized THPs are kept intact and can be reused by others.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20240229183436.4110845-3-yuzhao@google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists