| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240801060826.559858-21-rppt@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:08:20 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/26] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_memblks_init
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
Move most of x86::numa_init() to numa_memblks so that the latter will be
more self-contained.
With this numa_memblk data structures should not be exposed to the
architecture specific code.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 40 ++++-------------------------------
include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 3 +++
mm/numa_memblks.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 8eb15578625e..16bc703c9272 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -115,13 +115,9 @@ void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %u nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
}
-static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
+static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
{
- int nid, err;
-
- err = numa_register_meminfo(mi);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ int nid;
if (!memblock_validate_numa_coverage(SZ_1M))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -171,39 +167,11 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++)
set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
- nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
- nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
- nodes_clear(node_online_map);
- memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
- WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
- NUMA_NO_NODE));
- WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.reserved,
- NUMA_NO_NODE));
- /* In case that parsing SRAT failed. */
- WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, ULLONG_MAX));
- numa_reset_distance();
-
- ret = init_func();
+ ret = numa_memblks_init(init_func, /* memblock_force_top_down */ true);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- /*
- * We reset memblock back to the top-down direction
- * here because if we configured ACPI_NUMA, we have
- * parsed SRAT in init_func(). It is ok to have the
- * reset here even if we did't configure ACPI_NUMA
- * or acpi numa init fails and fallbacks to dummy
- * numa init.
- */
- memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
-
- ret = numa_cleanup_meminfo(&numa_meminfo);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
- numa_emulation(&numa_meminfo, numa_distance_cnt);
-
- ret = numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo);
+ ret = numa_register_nodes();
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
index f81f98678074..07381320848f 100644
--- a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
+++ b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ int __init numa_register_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi);
void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask,
const struct numa_meminfo *mi);
+int __init numa_memblks_init(int (*init_func)(void),
+ bool memblock_force_top_down);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
int numa_emu_cmdline(char *str);
void __init numa_emu_update_cpu_to_node(int *emu_nid_to_phys,
diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index e3c3519725d4..7749b6f6b250 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -415,6 +415,47 @@ int __init numa_register_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
return 0;
}
+int __init numa_memblks_init(int (*init_func)(void),
+ bool memblock_force_top_down)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
+ nodes_clear(node_online_map);
+ memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
+ WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
+ NUMA_NO_NODE));
+ WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.reserved,
+ NUMA_NO_NODE));
+ /* In case that parsing SRAT failed. */
+ WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, ULLONG_MAX));
+ numa_reset_distance();
+
+ ret = init_func();
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * We reset memblock back to the top-down direction
+ * here because if we configured ACPI_NUMA, we have
+ * parsed SRAT in init_func(). It is ok to have the
+ * reset here even if we did't configure ACPI_NUMA
+ * or acpi numa init fails and fallbacks to dummy
+ * numa init.
+ */
+ if (memblock_force_top_down)
+ memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
+
+ ret = numa_cleanup_meminfo(&numa_meminfo);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ numa_emulation(&numa_meminfo, numa_distance_cnt);
+
+ return numa_register_meminfo(&numa_meminfo);
+}
+
static int __init cmp_memblk(const void *a, const void *b)
{
const struct numa_memblk *ma = *(const struct numa_memblk **)a;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists