[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89b10ddb-9d0e-480e-846f-64f2a4592f6f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:07:24 +0200
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
mathias.nyman@...el.com, perex@...ex.cz, conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, bgoswami@...cinc.com, tiwai@...e.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 10/34] ASoC: usb: Create SOC USB SND jack kcontrol
> +static inline int snd_soc_usb_setup_offload_jack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> + struct snd_soc_jack *jack)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int snd_soc_usb_disable_offload_jack(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
usually fallback functions return 0, is the error code intentional?
> +int snd_soc_usb_setup_offload_jack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> + struct snd_soc_jack *jack)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = snd_soc_card_jack_new(component->card, "USB Offload Playback Jack",
do we need the reference to Playback?
> + SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, jack);
wondering if there would be any merit in defining a new type of jack,
e.g. SND_JACK_USB since here the purpose is to notify that there's a USB
device connected. The type of device does not really matter, does it?
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(component->card->dev, "Unable to add USB offload jack\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = snd_soc_component_set_jack(component, jack, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(component->card->dev, "Failed to set jack: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists