lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACePvbV4L-gRN9UKKuUnksfVJjOTq_5Sti2-e=pb_w51kucLKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:18:33 -0700
From: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, 
	liuzixing@...on.cn, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/gup: Clear the LRU flag of a page before adding to
 LRU batch

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:56 PM Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> I can't reproduce this problem, using tmpfs to compile linux.
> >> Seems you limit the memory size used to compile linux, which leads to
> >> OOM. May I ask why the memory size is limited to 481280kB? Do I also
> >> need to limit the memory size to 481280kB to test?
> >
> > Yes, you need to limit the cgroup memory size to force the swap
> > action. I am using memory.max = 470M.
> >
> > I believe other values e.g. 800M can trigger it as well. The reason to
> > limit the memory to cause the swap action.
> > The goal is to intentionally overwhelm the memory load and let the
> > swap system do its job. The 470M is chosen to cause a lot of swap
> > action but not too high to cause OOM kills in normal kernels.
> > In another word, high enough swap pressure but not too high to bust
> > into OOM kill. e.g. I verify that, with your patch reverted, the
> > mm-stable kernel can sustain this level of swap pressure (470M)
> > without OOM kill.
> >
> > I borrowed the 470M magic value from Hugh and verified it works with
> > my test system. Huge has a similar swab test up which is more
> > complicated than mine. It is the inspiration of my swap stress test
> > setup.
> >
> > FYI, I am using "make -j32" on a machine with 12 cores (24
> > hyperthreading). My typical swap usage is about 3-5G. I set my
> > swapfile size to about 20G.
> > I am using zram or ssd as the swap backend.  Hope that helps you
> > reproduce the problem.
> >
> Hi Chris,
>
> I try to construct the experiment according to your suggestions above.

Hi Ge,

Sorry to hear that you were not able to reproduce it.

> High swap pressure can be triggered, but OOM can't be reproduced. The
> specific steps are as follows:
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/home/yangge# cp workspace/linux/ /dev/shm/ -rf

I use a slightly different way to setup the tmpfs:

Here is section of my script:

        if ! [ -d $tmpdir ]; then
                sudo mkdir -p $tmpdir
                sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=100% nodev $tmpdir
        fi

        sudo mkdir -p $cgroup
        sudo sh -c "echo $mem > $cgroup/memory.max" || echo setup
memory.max error
        sudo sh -c "echo 1 > $cgroup/memory.oom.group" || echo setup
oom.group error

Per run:

       # $workdir is under $tmpdir
        sudo rm -rf $workdir
        mkdir -p $workdir
        cd $workdir
        echo "Extracting linux tree"
        XZ_OPT='-T0 -9 –memory=75%' tar xJf $linux_src || die "xz
extract failed"

        sudo sh -c "echo $BASHPID > $cgroup/cgroup.procs"
        echo "Cleaning linux tree, setup defconfig"
        cd $workdir/linux
        make -j$NR_TASK clean
        make defconfig > /dev/null
        echo Kernel compile run $i
        /usr/bin/time -a -o $log make --silent -j$NR_TASK  || die "make failed"


> root@...ntu-server-2204:/home/yangge# sync
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/home/yangge# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/home/yangge# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/sys/fs/cgroup/# mkdir kernel-build
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/sys/fs/cgroup/# cd kernel-build
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/sys/fs/cgroup/kernel-build# echo 470M > memory.max
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/sys/fs/cgroup/kernel-build# echo $$ > cgroup.procs
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/sys/fs/cgroup/kernel-build# cd /dev/shm/linux/
> root@...ntu-server-2204:/dev/shm/linux# make clean && make -j24

I am using make -j 32.

Your step should work.

Did you enable MGLRU in your .config file? Mine did. I attached my
config file here.

>
> Please help to see which step does not meet your requirements.

How many cores does your server have? I assume your RAM should be
plenty on that server.

Chris

Download attachment "config" of type "application/octet-stream" (184011 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ