linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DB9PR04MB84619D581E540351FBA73ECD88B32@DB9PR04MB8461.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 02:51:10 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, "cristian.marussi@....com"
	<cristian.marussi@....com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org"
	<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system
 power protocol

Hi Sudeep, Cristian,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
> 
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:15:20PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> support
> > > system power protocol
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> > > support
> > > > system power protocol
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id
> is
> > > > 0x12.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or
> > > > any other required property.
> > >
> > > I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And
> > > Cristian gave some comments:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > >
> >
> > Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.
> >
> > Should I switch back to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > or else?
> >
> 
> Sorry I need to discuss with Cristain and decide. I might have already
> discussed but I can't recall the details or decision(if any) made after
> that. He is away now, will get back once we discuss and see what is the
> best approach.
> 

Do you have any update on this?

Thanks,
Peng.

> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep