[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zqyo4qjPRHUeUfS5@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:37:38 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>,
Ramon Fried <ramon@...reality.ai>,
Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dma: replace zone_dma_bits by zone_dma_limit
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:03:47AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 3b4be4ca3b08..62b36fda44c9 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> * it for entirely different regions. In that case the arch code needs to
> * override the variable below for dma-direct to work properly.
> */
> -unsigned int zone_dma_bits __ro_after_init = 24;
> +u64 zone_dma_limit __ro_after_init = DMA_BIT_MASK(24);
u64 here makes sense even if it may be larger than phys_addr_t. It
matches the phys_limit type in the swiotlb code. The compilers should no
longer complain.
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> index d10613eb0f63..7b04f7575796 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static bool cma_in_zone(gfp_t gfp)
> /* CMA can't cross zone boundaries, see cma_activate_area() */
> end = cma_get_base(cma) + size - 1;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) && (gfp & GFP_DMA))
> - return end <= DMA_BIT_MASK(zone_dma_bits);
> + return end <= zone_dma_limit;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32) && (gfp & GFP_DMA32))
> - return end <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + return end <= max(DMA_BIT_MASK(32), zone_dma_limit);
> return true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 043b0ecd3e8d..bb51bd5335ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -450,9 +450,9 @@ int swiotlb_init_late(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (!remap)
> io_tlb_default_mem.can_grow = true;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_DMA))
> - io_tlb_default_mem.phys_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(zone_dma_bits);
> + io_tlb_default_mem.phys_limit = zone_dma_limit;
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_DMA32))
> - io_tlb_default_mem.phys_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + io_tlb_default_mem.phys_limit = max(DMA_BIT_MASK(32), zone_dma_limit);
> else
> io_tlb_default_mem.phys_limit = virt_to_phys(high_memory - 1);
> #endif
These two look correct to me now and it's the least intrusive (the
alternative would have been a zone_dma32_limit). The arch code, however,
needs to ensure that zone_dma_limit can always support 32-bit devices
even if it is above 4GB (with the relevant dma offsets in place for such
devices).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists