[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240802100447.GB18509@ветеран.su>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:04:47 +0000
From: Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan <jin@...iatomb.cc>
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@...ts.zabbadoz.net>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
heiko@...ech.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2 RESEND] Add DTS for NanoPi R2S Plus
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:46:40AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >I noticed, that a DTS for the R2S Plus is not yet available, while the
> >R2S is already there. The only difference is, that the Plus version has an
> >eMMC, so we can reuse the R2S definitions and only add an eMMC block, which
> >I copied from the DTS in the friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip repo.
>
> The original has a
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>
> please don't lose the OR MIT as other projects outside Linux do use the
> same dts files; and the original r2s file also preserved it.
Uhm... I am confused now, I copy-pasted the emmc block from this file:
https://github.com/friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip/blob/nanopi4-v2017.09/arch/arm/dts/rk3328-nanopi-r2.dts#L7
The header does not have the "OR MIT" in there, it's just
"SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+" which is what I also copied
over, together with the (c) part.
The source which I was using is described in the commit message:
The eMMC configuration for the DTS has been extracted and copied from
rk3328-nanopi-r2.dts, v2017.09 branch from the friendlyarm/uboot-rockchip
repository.
Maybe you looked at a different branch? Shall I still add the "OR
MIT" or leave it as in the original file which I copied it from?
Kind regards,
Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists