linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v7 3/6] irqchip: add mpfs gpio interrupt mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sevn1a3d.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 12:40:38 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Daire McNamara
 <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley
 <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 3/6] irqchip: add mpfs gpio interrupt mux

On Fri, Aug 02 2024 at 09:08, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 01 2024 at 16:09, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >> > +	/*
>> >> > +	 * If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding interrupt from
>> >> > +	 * controller 2 is direct and that controllers 0 or 1 is muxed.
>> >> 
>> >> This is not a coherent sentence.
>> >
>> > It should read "controller 0 or 1;s interrupt is muxed". Does that make
>
> Heh, I even typoed here, the ; should be a '.
>
>> > more sense to you?
>> 
>> No: If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding...
>> 
>> I'm already failing at 'GPIO'. My parser expects a verb there :)
>
> Ah, so double mistake in the sentence. s/GPIO// I suppose. An updated
> comment could be:
>
> "If a bit is set in the mux, the corresponding interrupt from GPIO
> controller 2 is direct and controller 0 or 1's interrupt is muxed"

That's actually understandable for mere mortals :)