[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <182c4b0b-6c69-4119-90ca-4e52bcad0409@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:07:23 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz, ritesh.list@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] ext4: get rid of ppath in
ext4_ext_create_new_leaf()
On 2024/8/2 15:34, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0800, libaokun@...weicloud.com wrote:
>> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
>>
>> The use of path and ppath is now very confusing, so to make the code more
>> readable, pass path between functions uniformly, and get rid of ppath.
>>
>> To get rid of the ppath in ext4_ext_create_new_leaf(), the following is
>> done here:
>>
>> * Free the extents path when an error is encountered.
>> * Its caller needs to update ppath if it uses ppath.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> Hi Baokun,
Hey Ojaswin,
> The changes look good to me, feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Thank you very much for your review!
>
> That being said, IIUC i think this patchset also fixes a potential UAF
> bug. Below is a sample trace with dummy values:
>
> ext4_ext_insert_extent
> path = *ppath = 2000
> ext4_ext_create_new_leaf(ppath)
> path = *ppath = 2000
> ext4_find_extent(path = 2000)
> if (depth > path[0].p_maxdepth)
> kfree(path = 2000);
> path = NULL;
> path = kcalloc() = 3000
> ...
> return path;
> path = 3000
> *ppath = 3000;
> return;
> /* here path is still 2000 *, UAF! */
> eh = path[depth].p_hdr
>
> I'm not completely sure if we can hit (depth > path[0].p_maxdepth) in the
> above codepath but I think the flow is still a bit fragile. Maybe this
> should be fixed in a separate patch first. What do you think?
>
> Regards,
> ojaswin
Nice catch!
This is indeed a potential UAF issue, and while it seems hard to
trigger (depth > path[0].p_maxdepth), it does deserve a separate
patch, and I'll be adding a separate quick fix for this in the next version.
Regards,
Baokun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists