linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/9] riscv: Safely remove huge_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240802151430.99114-2-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Aug 2024 17:14:22 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/9] riscv: Safely remove huge_pte_offset() when manipulating NAPOT ptes

The pte_t pointer is expected to point to the first entry of the NAPOT
mapping so no need to use huge_pte_offset(), similarly to what is done
in arm64.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 42314f093922..6b09cd1ef41c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ int huge_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	order = napot_cont_order(pte);
 	pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
-	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
 	orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
 
 	if (pte_dirty(orig_pte))
@@ -322,7 +321,6 @@ void huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	order = napot_cont_order(pte);
 	pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
-	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
 	orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
 
 	orig_pte = pte_wrprotect(orig_pte);
-- 
2.39.2