| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240802152109.137243-3-afd@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:21:02 -0500
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth
Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo
<kristo@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Hari Nagalla
<hnagalla@...com>
CC: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 2/9] remoteproc: k3: Factor out TI-SCI processor control OF get function
Building the TSP structure is common for users of the TI-SCI processor
control interface. Factor out this function and put it with the rest
of the TI-SCI processor control functions.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 28 +----------------------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 28 +----------------------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
index a22d41689a7d2..1585769092924 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -636,32 +636,6 @@ static void k3_dsp_release_tsp(void *data)
ti_sci_proc_release(tsp);
}
-static
-struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
- const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
-{
- struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
- u32 temp[2];
- int ret;
-
- ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
- temp, 2);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
- tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!tsp)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- tsp->dev = dev;
- tsp->sci = sci;
- tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
- tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
- tsp->host_id = temp[1];
-
- return tsp;
-}
-
static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -711,7 +685,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset),
"failed to get reset\n");
- kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
+ kproc->tsp = ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp),
"failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n");
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index 39a47540c5900..dd6294ab81e2e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1533,32 +1533,6 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
return 0;
}
-static
-struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
- const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
-{
- struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
- u32 temp[2];
- int ret;
-
- ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-proc-ids",
- temp, 2);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
- tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!tsp)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- tsp->dev = dev;
- tsp->sci = sci;
- tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
- tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
- tsp->host_id = temp[1];
-
- return tsp;
-}
-
static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1633,7 +1607,7 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
- core->tsp = k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(dev, core->ti_sci);
+ core->tsp = ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(dev, core->ti_sci);
if (IS_ERR(core->tsp)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(core->tsp);
dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n",
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
index 778558abcdcc5..f3911ce75252e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h
@@ -28,6 +28,32 @@ struct ti_sci_proc {
u8 host_id;
};
+static inline
+struct ti_sci_proc *ti_sci_proc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
+ const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
+{
+ struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
+ u32 temp[2];
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-proc-ids",
+ temp, 2);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+ tsp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tsp)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ tsp->dev = dev;
+ tsp->sci = sci;
+ tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
+ tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
+ tsp->host_id = temp[1];
+
+ return tsp;
+}
+
static inline int ti_sci_proc_request(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp)
{
int ret;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists