linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 09/11] s390/mm/fault: convert do_secure_storage_access() from follow_page() to folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240802155524.517137-10-david@redhat.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Aug 2024 17:55:22 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 09/11] s390/mm/fault: convert do_secure_storage_access() from follow_page() to folio_walk

Let's get rid of another follow_page() user and perform the conversion
under PTL: Note that this is also what follow_page_pte() ends up doing.

Unfortunately we cannot currently optimize out the additional reference,
because arch_make_folio_accessible() must be called with a raised
refcount to protect against concurrent conversion to secure. We can just
move the arch_make_folio_accessible() under the PTL, like
follow_page_pte() would.

We'll effectively drop the "writable" check implied by FOLL_WRITE:
follow_page_pte() would also not check that when calling
arch_make_folio_accessible(), so there is no good reason for doing that
here.

We'll lose the secretmem check from follow_page() as well, about which
we shouldn't really care about.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index 8e149ef5e89b..ad8b0d6b77ea 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
 #include <linux/kfence.h>
+#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
 #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -492,9 +493,9 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	union teid teid = { .val = regs->int_parm_long };
 	unsigned long addr = get_fault_address(regs);
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+	struct folio_walk fw;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	struct folio *folio;
-	struct page *page;
 	struct gmap *gmap;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -536,15 +537,18 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
 		if (!vma)
 			return handle_fault_error(regs, SEGV_MAPERR);
-		page = follow_page(vma, addr, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_GET);
-		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page)) {
+		folio = folio_walk_start(&fw, vma, addr, 0);
+		if (!folio) {
 			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 			break;
 		}
-		folio = page_folio(page);
-		if (arch_make_folio_accessible(folio))
-			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
+		/* arch_make_folio_accessible() needs a raised refcount. */
+		folio_get(folio);
+		rc = arch_make_folio_accessible(folio);
 		folio_put(folio);
+		folio_walk_end(&fw, vma);
+		if (rc)
+			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
 		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 		break;
 	case KERNEL_FAULT:
-- 
2.45.2