lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202408030016.QLOhRHF1-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 01:16:52 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, lee@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
	linux@...ck-us.net, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, ukleinek@...ian.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] mfd: add base driver for qnap-mcu devices

Hi Heiko,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on next-20240801]
[also build test WARNING on v6.11-rc1]
[cannot apply to groeck-staging/hwmon-next lee-leds/for-leds-next lee-mfd/for-mfd-next lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes linus/master v6.11-rc1 v6.10 v6.10-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Heiko-Stuebner/dt-bindings-mfd-add-binding-for-qnap-ts433-mcu-devices/20240802-103948
base:   next-20240801
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240731212430.2677900-3-heiko%40sntech.de
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] mfd: add base driver for qnap-mcu devices
config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030016.QLOhRHF1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030016.QLOhRHF1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408030016.QLOhRHF1-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/device.h:15,
                    from include/linux/platform_device.h:13,
                    from include/linux/mfd/core.h:13,
                    from drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c:12:
   drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c: In function 'qnap_mcu_receive_buf':
>> drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c:108:31: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
     108 |                 dev_warn(dev, "received %lu bytes, we were not waiting for\n",
         |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:30: note: in definition of macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
     110 |                 _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);                       \
         |                              ^~~
   include/linux/dev_printk.h:156:61: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_fmt'
     156 |         dev_printk_index_wrap(_dev_warn, KERN_WARNING, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
         |                                                             ^~~~~~~
   drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c:108:17: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_warn'
     108 |                 dev_warn(dev, "received %lu bytes, we were not waiting for\n",
         |                 ^~~~~~~~
   drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c:108:43: note: format string is defined here
     108 |                 dev_warn(dev, "received %lu bytes, we were not waiting for\n",
         |                                         ~~^
         |                                           |
         |                                           long unsigned int
         |                                         %u


vim +108 drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c

    96	
    97	static size_t qnap_mcu_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev,
    98					   const u8 *buf, size_t size)
    99	{
   100		struct device *dev = &serdev->dev;
   101		struct qnap_mcu *mcu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   102		struct qnap_mcu_reply *reply = mcu->reply;
   103		const u8 *src = buf;
   104		const u8 *end = buf + size;
   105	
   106		mutex_lock(&mcu->reply_lock);
   107		if (!reply) {
 > 108			dev_warn(dev, "received %lu bytes, we were not waiting for\n",
   109				 size);
   110			mutex_unlock(&mcu->reply_lock);
   111			return size;
   112		}
   113	
   114		while (src < end) {
   115			reply->data[reply->received] = *src++;
   116			reply->received++;
   117	
   118			if (reply->received == reply->length) {
   119				complete(&reply->done);
   120				mutex_unlock(&mcu->reply_lock);
   121	
   122				/*
   123				 * We report the consumed number of bytes. If there
   124				 * are still bytes remaining (though there shouldn't)
   125				 * the serdev layer will re-execute this handler with
   126				 * the remainder of the Rx bytes.
   127				 */
   128				return src - buf;
   129			}
   130		}
   131	
   132		/*
   133		 * The only way to get out of the above loop and end up here
   134		 * is through consuming all of the supplied data, so here we
   135		 * report that we processed it all.
   136		 */
   137		mutex_unlock(&mcu->reply_lock);
   138		return size;
   139	}
   140	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ