[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zq4OMPDHO7ONIKXe@J2N7QTR9R3>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 12:02:08 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_pmu: Use of_property_present()
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 01:12:53PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
> of_find_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove callers
> of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks
> the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
> dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
I assume Will will pick this up.
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> index 4b1a9a92ea11..118170a5cede 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int pmu_parse_percpu_irq(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int irq)
>
> static bool pmu_has_irq_affinity(struct device_node *node)
> {
> - return !!of_find_property(node, "interrupt-affinity", NULL);
> + return of_property_present(node, "interrupt-affinity");
> }
>
> static int pmu_parse_irq_affinity(struct device *dev, int i)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists