[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce758ef7-142a-453d-a37e-f64268256f3c@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:51:54 +0100
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
<mike.leach@...aro.org>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] perf auxtrace: Iterate all AUX events when finish
reading
On 8/1/24 16:04, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 06:38:59PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>> Just a heads up. Arnaldo added this to tmp.perf-tools-next and it
>> caused the intel-pt tests to start failing:
Sorry for causing regression and thanks for reporting the issue.
> My plan right now is just to remove that cset that Ian bisected since it
> is not on perf-tools-next, just on the scratch branch
> tmp.perf-tools-next.
Please leave the patch 04 out. I have sent out v2 but Adrian pointed out a
concern for per-thread mode, now I am working on this and after ready I will
send new patches.
I have verified the latest perf-tools-next branch, it works well on Arm SPE
(thanks for picking up patches 05 and 06).
> Trying to do that now as it will help us with bisection in the future.
I am not clear this. Could you elaborate a bit what I should follow up?
>> ```
>> $ perf test 118 -v
>> 118: Miscellaneous Intel PT testing:
>> --- start ---
>> test child forked, pid 148999
>> --- Test system-wide sideband ---
>> Checking for CPU-wide recording on CPU 0
>> OK
>> Checking for CPU-wide recording on CPU 1
>> OK
>> Linux
>> Failed to enable event (idx=0): -22
>> Failed to record MMAP events on CPU 1 when tracing CPU 0
>> ...
>> ```
>> It's likely Adrian's comments already address this but you may also
>> want to double check this test is passing with v2.
Sure. I will give a test for this test when I send new patches.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists