[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459b6cf2-7e61-4336-8b46-fa5b8841e9de@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:56:10 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Drop required-opps in
required on SM8650 camcc
On 01/08/2024 08:44, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> On SM8650, the minimum voltage corner supported on MMCX from cmd-db is
> sufficient for clock controllers to operate and there is no need to specify
> the required-opps. Hence remove the required-opps property from the list of
> required properties for SM8650 camcc bindings.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists