linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] drm/vkms: Fix cpu_to_le16()/le16_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zq-29RHgywzw96xz@fedora>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 19:14:29 +0200
From: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
To: rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com
Cc: melissa.srw@...il.com, mairacanal@...eup.net, hamohammed.sa@...il.com,
	daniel@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
	mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	louis.chauvet@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/vkms: Fix cpu_to_le16()/le16_to_cpu() warnings

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 06:17:26PM +0200, José Expósito wrote:
> Building with Sparse enabled prints this warning for cpu_to_le16()
> calls:
> 
>     warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>         expected unsigned short [usertype]
>         got restricted __le16 [usertype]
> 
> And this warning for le16_to_cpu() calls:
> 
>     warning: cast to restricted __le16
> 
> Declare the target buffer as __le16 to fix both warnings.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240712161656.7480-1-jose.exposito89@gmail.com/T/
> 
>  - Thomas Zimmermann: Declare "pixels" cariable as __le16 instead of
>    multiple casting.
> 
> v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240715151625.6968-2-jose.exposito89@gmail.com/
> 
>  - Thomas Zimmermann: Use cpu_to_le16() instead of casting 0xffff
>  - Reviewed-by Thomas and Louis
> ---

Would it be possible to get an ACK from the maintainers? It is a very simple patch
and it already has 2 reviewed-by, hopefully we can get it merged.

Thanks a lot in advance!

>  drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> index 36046b12f296..040b7f113a3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void XRGB8888_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixe
>  
>  static void ARGB16161616_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)src_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)src_pixels;
>  
>  	out_pixel->a = le16_to_cpu(pixels[3]);
>  	out_pixel->r = le16_to_cpu(pixels[2]);
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void ARGB16161616_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_
>  
>  static void XRGB16161616_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)src_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)src_pixels;
>  
>  	out_pixel->a = (u16)0xffff;
>  	out_pixel->r = le16_to_cpu(pixels[2]);
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void XRGB16161616_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_
>  
>  static void RGB565_to_argb_u16(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)src_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)src_pixels;
>  
>  	s64 fp_rb_ratio = drm_fixp_div(drm_int2fixp(65535), drm_int2fixp(31));
>  	s64 fp_g_ratio = drm_fixp_div(drm_int2fixp(65535), drm_int2fixp(63));
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void argb_u16_to_XRGB8888(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel
>  
>  static void argb_u16_to_ARGB16161616(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)dst_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)dst_pixels;
>  
>  	pixels[3] = cpu_to_le16(in_pixel->a);
>  	pixels[2] = cpu_to_le16(in_pixel->r);
> @@ -188,9 +188,9 @@ static void argb_u16_to_ARGB16161616(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_p
>  
>  static void argb_u16_to_XRGB16161616(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)dst_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)dst_pixels;
>  
> -	pixels[3] = 0xffff;
> +	pixels[3] = cpu_to_le16(0xffff);
>  	pixels[2] = cpu_to_le16(in_pixel->r);
>  	pixels[1] = cpu_to_le16(in_pixel->g);
>  	pixels[0] = cpu_to_le16(in_pixel->b);
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void argb_u16_to_XRGB16161616(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_p
>  
>  static void argb_u16_to_RGB565(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel)
>  {
> -	u16 *pixels = (u16 *)dst_pixels;
> +	__le16 *pixels = (__force __le16 *)dst_pixels;
>  
>  	s64 fp_rb_ratio = drm_fixp_div(drm_int2fixp(65535), drm_int2fixp(31));
>  	s64 fp_g_ratio = drm_fixp_div(drm_int2fixp(65535), drm_int2fixp(63));
> -- 
> 2.45.2
>