[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrBJaW_EwNf_T_WZ@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 04:39:21 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: crwulff@...il.com
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Sands <david.sands@...mp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: f_fs: add capability for dfu run-time
descriptor
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 08:06:40PM -0400, crwulff@...il.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h b/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h
> index 44d73ba8788d..91f0f7e214a5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h
> @@ -254,6 +254,9 @@ struct usb_ctrlrequest {
> #define USB_DT_DEVICE_CAPABILITY 0x10
> #define USB_DT_WIRELESS_ENDPOINT_COMP 0x11
> #define USB_DT_WIRE_ADAPTER 0x21
> +/* From USB Device Firmware Upgrade Specification, Revision 1.1 */
> +#define USB_DT_DFU_FUNCTIONAL 0x21
This is the only place in the entire patch where you explain what "DFU"
means. Is this really such a well-known acronym that it doesn't need to
be in the documentation or the commit message?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists